Korean Christian Council Opposes Anti-Discrimination Bill Over Concerns

The Korean Christian Council has expressed strong opposition to a proposed anti-discrimination law and an amendment to the Civil Code, citing concerns that these measures could threaten religious freedom and lead to what it describes as “reverse discrimination.” In a statement released on February 2, 2024, the council, led by Chairman Kim Jeong-seok, urged lawmakers to reconsider the legislation, arguing that it risks infringing upon the rights of orthodox churches and the freedom of belief.

The council acknowledged support for some policy directions outlined by President Lee Jae-myung during his New Year press conference. This includes reinforcing the separation of church and state and enforcing laws against groups it considers anti-social, specifically naming Shincheonji and the Unification Church as examples. Nonetheless, the council cautioned that such policies could unintentionally undermine the legitimate oversight role of mainstream churches and restrict religious expression.

In its statement, the council criticized the anti-discrimination bill currently under consideration by the National Assembly. It contended that the bill could serve as a mechanism for reverse discrimination, protecting pseudo-religious or heretical groups from criticism. The proposed legislation defines religion and ideology as protected categories, which the council claims could criminalize legitimate doctrinal criticism by labeling it as harassment or hate speech.

The statement emphasized, “If enacted, even legitimate criticism by orthodox churches pointing out doctrinal errors or anti-social behavior could be condemned as hate or harassment.” This concern highlights the potential for significant implications for freedom of speech within the context of religious discourse.

Additionally, the council raised objections to a proposed partial amendment to the Civil Code aimed at preventing collusion between religion and politics. The council argued that this amendment is not an appropriate tool for regulating anti-social religious behavior. Instead, it suggested that a separate special law would be more suitable should sanctions be deemed necessary.

This amendment, sponsored by independent lawmaker Choi Hyuk-jin, would allow for measures such as revoking the legal status of religious corporations found to violate the principle of church-state separation. The council contended that provisions allowing for the dissolution of religious organizations and confiscation of assets based on vague criteria represent excessive punishment and contradict constitutional values.

The ongoing debate surrounding these legislative proposals reflects broader tensions between the government’s intentions to regulate religious practices and the concerns of religious groups regarding their fundamental rights. As discussions continue in the National Assembly, the Korean Christian Council’s position underscores the need for a careful balance between anti-discrimination efforts and the protection of religious freedom in South Korea.