Korean Christian Council Opposes Anti-Discrimination Bill, Cites Threats to Freedom

The Korean Christian Council has voiced strong opposition to a proposed anti-discrimination law and an amendment to the Civil Code, claiming these measures pose a significant threat to religious freedom in South Korea. In a statement released on February 2, 2024, the council described the legislation as potentially creating “reverse discrimination” against orthodox churches.

In its statement, signed by Chairman Kim Jeong-seok and other co-chairmen, the council urged lawmakers to reconsider the implications of the proposed legislation. They argued that the bill, currently under consideration by the National Assembly, may infringe upon the rights of mainstream religious groups and the freedom to express belief.

The council indicated that while it broadly supports the policy direction outlined by President Lee Jae-myung during his New Year’s press conference, including the emphasis on separating church and state, it remains concerned about unintended consequences. The council believes that regulations aimed at curbing anti-social religious practices could inadvertently undermine the oversight role of established churches.

Critics of the anti-discrimination bill contend that it could provide protections to groups they classify as pseudo-religious or heretical. Specifically, the council noted that the legislation defines religion and ideology as protected categories, which could criminalize legitimate doctrinal criticism by labeling it as harassment or hate speech. The council stated, “If enacted, even legitimate criticism by orthodox churches pointing out doctrinal errors or anti-social behavior could be condemned as hate or harassment.”

Alongside its concerns regarding the anti-discrimination law, the council has also raised objections to a proposed amendment to the Civil Code. This amendment, sponsored by independent lawmaker Choi Hyuk-jin, seeks to prevent collusion between religion and politics. The council argues that this amendment is not the appropriate mechanism for regulating anti-social religious behavior and advocates for a separate special law if sanctions are deemed necessary.

The proposed amendment would allow for the revocation of the legal status of religious organizations found to violate the principle of church-state separation. The council maintains that provisions permitting the dissolution of religious organizations and the confiscation of their assets, based on vague criteria, amount to excessive punishment and contradict constitutional values.

As discussions about these legislative initiatives continue, the Korean Christian Council remains vocal about its stance, highlighting the need for a careful balance between regulatory measures and the protection of religious freedoms in South Korea.