Lawmakers Demand Action to Halt Trump’s Military Plans in Venezuela

Members of the U.S. Congress have called for immediate legislative action to prevent President Donald Trump from escalating military operations in Venezuela. Following Trump’s recent threats of a “second wave” of military action, lawmakers expressed their concerns about the administration’s ongoing interventions in the South American country, including bombings in international waters.

On January 3, 2026, Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), emphasized the need for Congress to vote on a War Powers Resolution. He stated, “Congress should vote immediately on a War Powers Resolution to stop” Trump’s military actions. Casar criticized the president’s approach, labeling it as reckless and illegal. He remarked, “Trump has no right to take us to war with Venezuela. This is reckless and illegal.”

Another prominent voice within the CPC, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), condemned the administration’s actions as indicative of a “rogue state.” Tlaib highlighted the illegality of the bombings and the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, asserting that these actions violate both international law and the U.S. Constitution. In a social media post, she stated, “The American people do not want another regime change war abroad.”

Calls for Congressional Intervention

The push for urgent legislative action gained traction not only among progressives but also from establishment Democrats. Sen. Adam Schiff (D-California) voiced concerns about the potential chaos brought upon by unauthorized military actions. He remarked, “Without congressional approval or the buy-in of the public, Trump risks plunging a hemisphere into chaos and has broken his promise to end wars instead of starting them.” Schiff urged Congress to reassert its power regarding military engagement.

In a similar vein, Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) announced plans to introduce a bipartisan War Powers Resolution aimed at blocking further military actions in Venezuela. He raised critical questions about the scope of Trump’s military intentions, asking, “Where will this go next?” Kaine underscored the necessity for Congress to reclaim its constitutional duty in matters of war. “It is long past time for Congress to reassert its critical constitutional role in matters of war, peace, diplomacy, and trade,” he stated.

The context of these demands comes as Trump indicated a willingness to continue intervening in Venezuela’s internal affairs, suggesting that the U.S. would “run” the country. During a press conference, he expressed that the administration is “designating various people” to manage the Venezuelan government, hinting at a potential troop deployment.

Republican Response and Legislative Dynamics

The response from the Republican-controlled Congress remains mixed. While some Republicans have supported Trump’s actions, including House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD), who described the military operation as “decisive” and justified, concerns about constitutional processes were voiced by others.

Before the recent military actions, Congress had rejected previous War Powers Resolutions aimed at curtailing Trump’s authority to engage in military actions without legislative approval. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who had previously raised constitutional issues regarding the administration’s actions, appeared to retract his concerns following discussions with Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Democratic Rep. Andy Kim (D-NJ) highlighted the contradictions in the administration’s stance, stating, “Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth looked every senator in the eye a few weeks ago and said this wasn’t about regime change.” Kim expressed distrust in the assurances provided by the administration, indicating a significant divide between the executive and legislative branches.

The developments surrounding Venezuela reflect broader tensions regarding U.S. military policy and the constitutional limits of executive power. As lawmakers prepare for potential votes on War Powers Resolutions, the political landscape remains fraught with uncertainty. The response from Congress, particularly from Republican members, will be crucial in determining the future of U.S. involvement in Venezuela.