Lewiston City Council Candidates Share Visions Ahead of Election

Seven candidates are vying for seats on the Lewiston City Council in the upcoming election on November 4, 2024. The top three vote-getters will secure four-year terms. Incumbents Kassee Forsmann and Matthew Wright are seeking reelection against challengers Andrea Ackerland, Bob Blakey, Linda Glines, and others. The Lewiston Tribune has posed a series of questions to each candidate, and this first installment features responses from Ackerland, Blakey, Forsmann, and Glines.

Candidate Motivations and Priorities

Andrea Ackerland expressed a desire for greater community engagement, stating, “It’s time for Lewiston residents to be heard.” She aims to address budget constraints and believes that prudent financial management is essential for the city’s future.

Bob Blakey shared his enthusiasm for local governance, noting the steep learning curve new councilors face. “I’m out of school and ready to go to work (on) day one,” he said, emphasizing his commitment to enhancing the quality of life in Lewiston.

Kassee Forsmann, running for reelection, aims to continue the progress made during her previous term. “I’ve worked hard to support responsible economic growth, improve our infrastructure, and make our community more affordable for families and businesses alike,” she stated. Forsmann highlighted the importance of streamlining development processes to attract new businesses while preserving the city’s unique character.

Linda Glines recounted her motivations stemming from a community issue regarding a housing project. “I realized how hard it is for an average person to navigate all the legal requirements just to be heard by the city,” she explained. Her goal is to ensure that Lewiston remains an attractive place for families and retirees alike.

Infrastructure Bond and Governance Structure

A significant topic in the election is the proposed $22.5 million bond intended to finance downtown infrastructure improvements. Ackerland voiced skepticism, stating, “I don’t believe we need more money to do a job that we have the money for.” She cautioned against the perception that the bond could become an “open checkbook” for spending.

In contrast, Blakey strongly supports the bond, asserting, “Nothing gets cheaper in the future. Our future is now.” Forsmann provided a balanced view, explaining that while the city currently has adequate funds for bond payments, the project’s full costs necessitate the bond to avoid future financial burdens from ongoing repairs.

Glines echoed support for the bond, emphasizing the urgency of the project. “The longer we wait, the more it is going to cost later,” she remarked.

Another area of discussion is the potential hiring of a city administrator to assist the mayor. Ackerland expressed uncertainty, noting the need for reduced spending before considering new positions. Blakey, who opposed the shift to a strong mayor governance model, stated that a city administrator should be appointed by the council, ensuring continuity regardless of the mayor’s tenure.

Forsmann supported the idea, arguing that an administrator would allow the mayor to focus on strategic community goals while managing daily operations. “This structure is common in many cities and has proven effective in improving efficiency and accountability,” she said.

Glines reiterated her support for hiring an administrator, provided that the job responsibilities warrant such a position.

The second installment featuring responses from Leafty, Moree, and Wright will be published on Friday. As the election date approaches, candidates are keen to convey their visions for Lewiston’s future.