Judge Dismisses Defamation Claim in Megan Thee Stallion Case

A recent ruling by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga has dismissed the defamation claim in Megan Thee Stallion‘s lawsuit against blogger Milagro Gramz. Despite a jury finding Gramz liable for defamation, the judge concluded that she qualified as a media defendant and noted that Thee Stallion’s legal team failed to inform her of the lawsuit. The final judgment was entered on March 12, 2024.

While the defamation claim was dismissed, the court confirmed that Megan Thee Stallion will receive $59,000 for counts of intentional infliction of emotional distress and the promotion of altered sexual depictions. The decision has sparked confusion on social media, prompting Megan to clarify the situation on X (formerly Twitter). In response to a tweet from journalist Meghann Cuniff, she stated, “Thank you… Here they go lying again AS USUAL. If you want REAL MEDIA/NEWS know how to be Patient and know how to READ.”

According to a letter from her legal team, the court has not yet issued a final judgment on the defamation claim. The letter clarified that Judge Altonaga would determine the total financial amount Gramz must pay Megan, including legal fees and damages related to the defamation claim, at a later date.

The lawsuit, initiated by Megan Thee Stallion in 2024, centered around accusations that Milagro Gramz propagated false information about her following the 2020 shooting involving Tory Lanez. The claims included the reposting of deepfake pornographic videos that depicted the rapper in a compromising manner.

Despite the dismissal of the defamation count, Judge Altonaga retains the authority to impose restrictions on Gramz regarding public statements about Thee Stallion moving forward.

Megan’s legal team expressed satisfaction with the outcome. Mari Henderson, one of her attorneys, remarked, “We’re thankful for the jury’s commitment to reinforcing the importance of truth, accountability, and responsible commentary on social media. Not only is Milagro being held accountable for paying Megan compensatory and punitive damages, but Florida’s fee-shifting legal provision will require her to cover the costs of Megan’s legal bills on the deepfake claim.” Henderson emphasized that this verdict sends a clear message about the serious consequences of spreading misinformation.

As the situation continues to unfold, the implications of this ruling may resonate within the broader conversation about accountability in the digital age.